The Address Supporting OrganizationAC meeting minutes |
||
|
|
Minutes [Approved at the 11 July teleconference]ICANN Address Supporting Organization - Address Council Meetingvia Teleconference Wednesday 5 June 2002, 22:00 UTC Present:
Agenda
The Chair opened the call at 22:00 UTC. Apologies received from Paul Wilson, Wilfred Woeber, German Valdez, Seung-Min Lee, and Sabine Jaume. Chair asked if there was anything to add under AOB. MD stated that he wanted to discuss the AC's presence at ICANN meetings. The Chair requested discussing this later under AOB. The Chair asked SEC to provide update. SEC stated that the minutes had been posted to the list, comments received were incorporated and draft minutes were then posted to web. The Chair stated she would entertain a motion for approval. HPH motioned to approve and this was seconded by ED. The Chair called for vote and the motion passed unanimously. Open action itemsShelf list [items pending action outside the ASO AC]The Chair asked if action could be taken, the SEC responded not yet. The Chair then asked for any other comments. There were no other comments. MD noted that in the past the ASO has had the opportunity, through the RIR events, to meet and coordinate. He stated that since the ASO is part of the ICANN organization, it would be fine if there were an ASO presence on the formal ICANN agenda posted on the ICANN website. He noted that up to now, there is no mention of any ASO meeting during the ICANN meeting. MD asked if the AC could state if this should be the ultimate position of the ASO to be or not to be present at the ICANN meetings. MD stated he worries about the absence of the ASO at the ICANN meeting and he would like to see an ASO presenced on the ICANN agenda, even if it is not a formal meeting. Discussion ensued and it was decided that since the RIRs fund the Chair's attendance, the Chair will always attend, and will give a presentation during the public forum. Given company budget cuts, it was agreed that it would not be probable that the AC as a whole could attend. MD stated that the Chair's attendance was a good compromise. He requested that the ICANN agenda reflect that there is a presentation to be given because as of now there is mention of it on ICANN's current agenda. The Chair agreed and stated that in addition, there would be no voluntary open forum unless the constituencies wanted it. It was felt that the best venue for this is at the RIR meetings. The Council agreed and no motion was needed. The SEC was asked to take action to arrange to get onto the agenda before the ICANN meeting and to give an update at the public policy forum unless constituencies want more. The Chair asked the SEC for the list of ASO attendees at upcoming meetings. It had previously been decided that a list of attendees for upcoming meetings would be done on a quarterly basis. The SEC stated that he did have a list of upcoming meetings, and had received info from participants. He stated he would send another notice as a reminder. The Chair asked for the link for the list. The SEC stated it could be found at: The Chair asked for any other business. She stated that the AC needed to discuss the ICANN evolution and reform report. JC asked if people had been receiving others responses. The answer was yes. JC then asked if he should send responses to the ASO list. The Chair thought that would be very helpful. The Chair commented that the reform document had not changed very much. JC asked if he should step out of the call, but the Chair did not think that was necessary. She commented that the AC can say they are functioning fine as they exist, but end up with very little participation at board level. RP then stated he needed to catch a flight and the Chair asked him if the RIRs had made a second response to ICANN. RP stated that there would be a joint RIR teleconference next week and a detailed response to ICANN would be sent shortly thereafter. The Chair asked for a copy when it was available. HPH stated that if the AC agree with the RIR joint response, they could simply make a resolution to that effect rather than producing their own statement. ED felt that the AC needed to make its own statement. The Chair suggested using support for RIR response as a primary statement with additional wording specifically stating the position of the ASO AC. ED agreed. The Chair suggested that when the AC receives the RIR's second response to ICANN, that a teleconference be arranged for whoever wants to attend and participate within the AC and that those individuals would draft a response. She asked the SEC when the AC could expect the RIR response and the SEC responded to expect it within the week following the joint teleconference. The SEC stated he would set up the AC conference call and time slot. The Chair then asked if there was any other business to discuss. There were no further comments. As agreed in previous meetings, at this point MD, RB, and JC voluntarily left the call. The ASO AC held a discussion to decide on which date they will hold their formal election. It was decided more time to discuss the qualifications of the candidates was needed and that the election should not be held until after the upcoming ICANN meeting in Romania. The Chair called for adjournment at 7:05 p.m. EST and this passed unanimously. Action items closed at this meeting
New action items
Shelf list [items pending action outside the ASO AC]
|
|
|
|
||